JHA_HeaderImage_Blog_v2.png

2 Big Changes That Will Impact Your Vendor Management

Posted by Jennifer Roland-Vlach

Jun 28, 2017 11:45:00 AM

Vendor management has always been a key part of financial institution (FI) compliance and risk management efforts. And recently, FIs have witnessed the importance of proper vendor management begin to receive even more emphasis. One area in particular that is contributing to this emphasis is the Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) No. 18 (SSAE 18) report. That’s right, SSAE 18, not 16. Effective May 1st, 2017, the SSAE 18 became the new standard report for vendors to provide to financial institutions.

Now, in my opinion, there has not been a lot of hype regarding this change. At least not like what we saw when the SAS70 report became the SSAE 16. The reason for this is due largely to the fact that the SSAE 18 does not appear to be drastically different from the SSAE 16. Which is definitely good news for community FIs.

While the changes between the SSAE 16 and 18 will not completely change an FI’s approach to vendor management, there are some changes that will impact the due diligence efforts of FIs, especially in regard to more critical vendors.

Read More

Topics: Financial Services Industry, Regulatory Compliance

3 Ways Credit Unions Can Make Their MBL Troubles All but Disappear

Posted by Jonathan Patrick

Dec 7, 2016 11:30:00 AM

Some credit unions didn’t get the news they wanted regarding recent changes by the National Credit Union Association (NCUA) to the Member Business Lending (MBL) regulations. The announcement included the removal of the requirement for personal guarantees from business loan borrowers. What the announcement didn’t include, to the chagrin of some credit unions, was the removal of the so-called “MBL cap.” If you aren’t familiar with this part of the regulation, Section 723.16(a) states “The aggregate limit on a credit union's net member business loan balances is the lesser of 1.75 times the credit union's net worth or 12.25% of the credit union's total assets.”

The MBL cap has long been a regulatory sore spot with some credit unions and some government officials. As far back as 2010, there were U.S. Congressmen sponsoring legislation to increase the MBL cap. Even as recent as May 2016, there were Congressional leaders expressing their desire to see the cap increased to encourage credit unions to expand lending to small business owners. (1) But the reality is that raising the cap would only positively impact a small number of credit unions. Credit Union Journal pointed out that of the 5,954 federally insured credit unions, only 106 credit unions were relatively close to the cap. (2)

Why then is the MBL cap such a “hot button” for some credit unions, especially when there are several ways, other than new legislation, to work around the cap?

 

Read More

Topics: Regulatory Compliance, Credit Unions

Subscribe to Email Updates

Untitled Document Untitled Document